Click here to learn more.
If you follow me on Facebook, you probably know that I got myself into some hot water with one of my recent posts, in which I described how an owner felt compelled to choose one pet over another after both of them got into a bottle of ibuprofen and ended up needing thousands of dollars of care.
Since she had only the money to save one dog, the client decided to euthanize the sicker pet — the one we'd deemed hardest to save.
It was a horrible story, but it seemed all the worse to those of you who took issue with the role of the veterinarians.
Here’s a sampling of your comments on the subject:
“My country vet would never expect you to choose. He would make payments available to save both. If that couldn’t happen, he would lower the cost. I would like to think that most vets would do the same.”
“There would be a way to treat both. If you have a relationship with a decent vet, there would be no issue.”
“How could a veterinarian require an owner to make that choice??”
“I wouldn't have a vet that would make me choose and wouldn't help me.”
That’s pretty harsh stuff to hear when you’re a vet, especially since I was involved in the case. But while I wasn’t the one delivering the multi-thousand-dollar estimates — most general practices are neither equipped nor qualified to treat cases of perforating gastrointestinal lesions — I can’t see how anyone can blame the specialty hospital for requiring payment.
According to a 2011 study conducted by Veterinary Economics and Wutchiett Tumblin and Associates, well-managed animal hospitals generate, on average, an 18 percent profit on their services, which means that a $10,000 estimate (it was just under that for one of the two dogs mentioned above) requires that the hospital effectively pay about $7,200 to save the dog. Even if the veterinarians involved donate their time, we’re still looking at around a $4,200 outlay on the hospital’s part.
That’s a lot of money. But regardless of whether we’re talking about a $1,000, $100 or $10 estimate, I do wonder why a vet should be expected to pay for a service.
When it comes to life-and-death decision making, however, lower sums start to mean a whole lot less, and veterinarians often choose to cover their clients. But, even then, the sacrifice should be considered a gift offered by someone who's electing to help, not an expectation. After all, euthanasia is considered a perfectly moral and ethical decision in these cases.
Allowing an animal to suffer because someone can’t pay for euthanasia? That’s cruel and horrible. Failing to offer to pay for a pet’s care? It’s a terrible position to find yourself in as a veterinarian, but here’s the truth: If I covered all of my life-and-death cases to the extent of my ability with all the equipment, supplies, services and assistance that it entails, I can promise you that I’d be out of business and not helping anyone.
As it is, at least a couple thousand dollars comes directly out of my pocket every year on payment plans for life-and-death situations that only about 50 percent of my clients pay back. I know it's a big risk to offer this option, but what can I do?
I suppose that I could do what many hospitals do and euthanize my patients when their owners can’t pay. Don’t get me wrong — I find myself doing this more often than is psychologically healthy for me. But if I didn’t, it wouldn’t be fair to me or my family.
To read more opinion pieces on Vetstreet, click here.
Like this article? Have a point of view to share? Let us know!
Thank You For Signing Up
for the Petwire newsletter, sending you all the pet news each week directly to your inbox.
Get the latest pet news, tips, tricks, and expert advice sent right to your inbox!
Susie reunited with her owner after a photo of her standing by the body of a man killed by the tornado went viral.
To commemorate World Turtle Day, we’re sharing steps you can take to help protect endangered and threatened…
This Memorial Day, we’re honoring Reckless, a Mongolian mare who served with a platoon of battle-tested…
Slugs, Pugs, hummingbirds and crows are just a few of the many creatures we spotted in the trailer for Epic.
A reader asks Mikkel Becker when he should train his exuberant puppy: before or after they go on a walk?
An adorable resident at the Lisbon Oceanarium in Portugal gives himself a good scrub on the head, neck and ears.
Claire Danes, Terri Hatcher and Diane Sawyer are a few celebrities who own the popular Cavalier King Charles Spaniel.
If the video doesn't start playing momentarily,
please install the latest version of Flash.