2001-Tue Jan 17 04:01:39 EST 2017
Vetstreet. All rights reserved.
Vetstreet does not provide medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. See Additional Information ›
A small white mouse scampers along the front edge of several glass-fronted cubes. They line an expansive wall, holes in a beehive — laboratory-style. Just beyond the glass, the mouse's red eyes dart, and his pink nose twitches in an excited rodent pantomime that we all know and love. (Some of us, anyway.)
Little does he know that he’s the subject of an experiment for which he’ll eventually be sacrificed in the name of science, progress and humanity — the last one writ largest of all.
Faced with this reality, most animal lovers like us take one of two tacts:
1. We decide that we cannot abide the sacrifice of one animal species for the benefit of another — namely ours — leaving us morally obligated to defend any creature that might be used in such a manner.
2. We take a more pragmatic stance, accepting that animals of certain species can and should be utilized for the benefit of humankind, as long as they are treated in accordance with progressive animal welfare standards.
Let’s head back to Algernon, scuttling about his well appointed cage in a laboratory somewhere.
If this scenario represents one of many increasingly besieged laboratories in the U.K., don’t expect this mouse to be one of the high-end, hard-to-get, transgenic mice used so often in Alzheimer's, cancer and diabetes research, among other impressively prevalent diseases.
Why, you ask? According to a recent USA Today article, a blockade restricting the importation of these animals into Great Britain is now well underway.
“Following campaigns by animal rights groups, several ferry companies and airlines, including British Airways, now refuse to carry mice, rats and rabbits intended for laboratory testing . . . ."
More than 3 million animals are used in British lab experiments each year — about 15,000 of them are imported. Less than 1 percent of the animals used in U.K. labs come from overseas, but scientists say that those particular animals, which are often genetically modified to model human diseases, are the most important.
It’s an impressive bit of work that the U.K. animal rights organizations have accomplished. I salute them on their tenacity, tactical prowess and ultimate success.
But is it the right thing to do? Should they have a right to impose their morality on those of us who love animals but accept that humans come first?
To be sure, there’s no clear line that we can draw on this issue. After all, we’re talking about a morally fraught subject that trades in distinctions not only between humans and mice, but that delves into those that include species as diverse as the lowly fruit fly and our closest relative, the chimpanzee.
Like this article? Have a point of view to share? Let us know!
Take our breed quiz to find your next pet.
Get all the best pet news and information sent right to your inbox!
Thank you for subscribing!
Electronic cigarettes may be growing in
popularity, but their higher concentrations
of nicotine can poison cats and…
Are you handling your pet the right way?
Our vet shares five things your pup wishes
you knew about picking him up.
We combed through 505,270 kitten
names to determine the hottest male
and female monikers of the year.
We scoured our database of 1.1 million
dogs to find out which male and female
monikers reigned supreme this past…
The laid-back American Wirehair’s crimped, coarse coat requires almost no brushing or combing.
Check out our collection of more than 250 videos about pet training, animal behavior, dog and cat breeds and more.
Wonder which dog or cat best fits your lifestyle? Our new tool will narrow down more than 300 breeds for you.
If the video doesn't start playing momentarily,
please install the latest version of Flash.
Thank you for subscribing.