Urban Bestiary Book Cover

A bestiary is a collection of stories about real and imagined animals. Dating back to the Middle Ages, bestiaries also offered commentary on the moral significance each animal was believed to embody.

The Urban Bestiary: Encountering the Everyday Wild is a modern take on this ancient form, combining folklore, poetry and history with notes on animal behavior and how to identify scat. While not as allegorical as its medieval predecessors, this is not your typical nature book. We talked to author Lyanda Lynn Haupt about what it means to live with the creatures that surround us every day.

Q. How do you see the balance between urbanization and wildlife?

A. Lyanda Lynn Haupt: People that are more on the animal's side say: They were here first, it's their place, so we should bend over backward to allow their presence. The other side says: They're dangerous, they're rabid, they don't belong here. I think both of those views are oversimplified. Even though it's true that they were here first, sometimes cohabitation is just too complicated. We can't live with bears, we can't live with cougars, it's too dangerous. We have to find ways to allow those animals to flourish in their places.

But there are all kinds of wild creatures that are more adaptable, that really can make their homes in human places. A lot of animals are here because we create the perfect places for them. The most common crow in our cities is the American crow, and nowadays they're hardly ever found where there are not humans. And that's because although they don't like us in particular — they're wary of us and they don't like our cars and they don't like our dogs — they do like our garbage cans. We provide so much safe free food for them. The pickings are too good — why would they go anywhere else?

Q. You also point out that there are animals who are actually here because we put them here.

A. Starlings and house sparrows — some of the most abundant species in North America — were intentionally introduced by acclimatization societies that wanted the settlers to experience the birds and the birdsong they were homesick for.

Starlings especially have an interesting story. The societies thought it would be a literary and noble thing to do to introduce all the species mentioned in the Shakespearean canon, and in Henry IV he mentions a starling that learned to talk. It's that one line by the great bard that led to the introduction of starlings and their taking over of North America.

Q. So, as far as coexistence, bears are out, starlings are in. How about coyotes?

A. Humans have always lived alongside coyotes, but human development is reaching so deeply into the last remaining habitat, so coyotes are needing to adapt to a more chopped-up habitat where humans live nearby. One really interesting thing to me is that they've really changed the way they live in order to live alongside us. In a more rural place, they'd wake and sleep throughout the day. They'd be out and busy more of the day. In urban places, in order to avoid us, they've become more nocturnal.

It's a human obligation to make sure we secure our garbage, bring our pets in, and if you see a coyote, as much as we might long to observe it, the kindest thing to do in terms of coexistence is to chase it away. The continued wariness that coyotes have around us is the best hope for humans to accept them living around us.

Lyanda Haupt, author of Urban Bestiary

Q. You note that we tend to know more about animals we see on TV than the animals in our own yard. The opossum is an interesting example; our dislike of these marsupials goes back to the first European settlers. Why is that?

A. They thought the opossum was the perfect example of the horrors and monstrosities that typified the new world. They would draw the animals that they were seeing on the edges of their maps, and the opossums were huge. They were the size of people, their teeth were bared, their clawed paws were gigantic.

Jefferson tried to make the opossum into sort of the nation's symbol. He thought it was gentle, that the fierce protectiveness of the female opossum was a good symbol of the young country. That was the opossum's most shining moment. It was a symbol that never quite made it.

I don't want to be an opossum apologist — they're sloppy eaters, they make these moist hissing sounds when they eat — but they're so misunderstood. They're harmless, quiet, gentle animals. We see them when they're cornered. They're baring their teeth, they're pretending to be dead — that's another kind of horrifying thing for people — so we see them at their worst. But if you just leave them alone and let them go on with their opossum day, there's something very sweet and calming about them.

Q. What are some ways to maximize the chances of living in harmony with urban wildlife?

A. Pets are one of the main points at which humans and wildlife come into conflict. A lot of the things we do to protect our pets are the exact same things that we do to allow wild animals to flourish: knowing what animals are around, and the cycles of their lives so we know when to be more careful. Knowing that although a female raccoon will leave us alone at any other time of the year, if we come between her and her young that's dangerous — and that's the same for our dogs and our cats. Knowing when to keep our cats in, not just for their safety but for the safety of young birds in the late spring when they're fledging.

And one of the most important things is tolerating a little inconvenience. If we want our neighborhood to not be sterile with just people and domestic pets and a few invasive birds, then we have to tolerate a little bit of uneasiness. But in return for a little bit of sacrifice, there's a lot of benefit and loveliness.

Q. What do you hope the reader takes away from this book?

A. I don't want the message of this book to be that we can go right outside our door and we can see so many native creatures and beautiful trees that we could study forever and still only be scratching the surface. That's true. But at this ecologically complicated time, there's a danger of people twisting that message and saying urban wildlife is enough.

What I really want the message to be is one of taking what we see outside our windows, and as we journey into our neighborhoods, and finding the connection there, and using that as a thread to connect with the more remote wild. There's wildlife all around, and this wildlife reminds us that everything we do, they way that we live our lives, connects us to the more remote wild.

Read more Vetstreet book reviews and author interviews.